<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Telemagen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.telemagen.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.telemagen.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dropbox: Now Open for Business</title>
		<link>http://www.telemagen.com/dropbox-for-business</link>
		<comments>http://www.telemagen.com/dropbox-for-business#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dropbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syncing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telemagen.com/?p=2068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dropbox for Teams delivers the same user experience as the free Dropbox service. Adding and updating files is as easy as saving any document, photo or video to the Dropbox folder. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2069" title="Dropbox For Businesses" src="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/db1.jpg" alt="" width="623" height="240" /></p>
<p><a title="Dropbox" href="http://dropbox.com" target="_blank">Dropbox</a>  is an indispensable part of many a computer users&#8217; arsenal, including several here at <a title="Telemagen" href="http://telemagen.com">Telemagen</a>. But, the company hasn&#8217;t had a viable option for businesses who would have an obvious use for a tool that allows you to easily sync files between PCs, share them amongst users and always have backups in the cloud. The boys and girls at the Y Combinator startup know that there&#8217;s lots of money to be made in the enterprise space and that&#8217;s why they&#8217;ve unveiled Dropbox for Teams. The general experience is the same, but rather than individually managed chunks of storage, teams share one large repository, starting at <strong>1TB</strong> for five users. The base plan costs <strong>$795</strong> a year and additional users, which also includes <strong>200GB</strong> of storage, can be tacked on for <strong>$125</strong> annually. The business offering also includes special tools for administrators to add or delete users and dedicated phone support.Check out the full PR below.</p>
<p><span id="more-2068"></span><div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Press Release</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>Dropbox Now Open for Business Dropbox Launches <strong>&#8220;Dropbox for Teams&#8221;</strong> With Administrative Controls and Plenty of Space</p>
<p>People Are Using Dropbox in Over One Million Businesses Globally</p>
<p>SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. – October 27, 2011 &#8211; Dropbox, a free service that lets people bring their documents, photos and videos everywhere and share them easily, today introduced Dropbox for Teams. More than 45 million people already depend on Dropbox, and with Dropbox for Teams, businesses can now experience the same ease-of-use along with new administrative controls, centralized billing, phone support, and plenty of space for everyone on the team.</p>
<p>&#8220;People in over a million businesses around the world trust Dropbox for its simplicity and reliability,&#8221; said Sujay Jaswa, vice president of business development and sales at Dropbox. &#8220;Now, Dropbox for Teams will give businesses the control and freedom to rethink how they work.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>How Dropbox for Teams Works</strong></p>
<p>Dropbox for Teams delivers the same user experience as the free Dropbox service. Adding and updating files is as easy as saving any document, photo or video to the Dropbox folder. Changes sync immediately across all devices which have Dropbox installed. Dropbox is compatible with nearly every computer and smartphone operating system, including Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android, and BlackBerry.</p>
<p>With Dropbox for Teams, administrators get new features including centralized billing, phone support, and controls allowing them to add or delete users. Dropbox for Teams is priced at $795 annually for five users, with additional seats available for $125 each. The base plan includes 1,000 GB of storage, and each additional seat comes with 200 GB.</p>
<p>Like Dropbox, Dropbox for Teams is a secure solution. Files are stored encrypted on Amazon S3 in secure data centers and also remain on users&#8217; Dropbox-synced computers for added backup.</p>
<p>Visit www.dropbox.com/teams for more information.</p>
<p><strong>About Dropbox</strong></p>
<p>The mission of Dropbox is to simplify life for people around the world. Dropbox lets people bring their documents, photos and videos everywhere and share them easily. The service has more than 45 million users in 175 countries saving one billion files every three days. Dropbox was founded in San Francisco in 2007 by Drew Houston and Arash Ferdowsi and has received a total of <strong>$257.2</strong> million in funding. </div>
				</div></p>
<h4><!--more--> Do you think this is a viable solution for your business or organization?</h4>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.telemagen.com/dropbox-for-business/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Lowering Prices Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.telemagen.com/news/apple-strategy</link>
		<comments>http://www.telemagen.com/news/apple-strategy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telemagen.com/?p=2043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past, Apple had always been seen as a company selling niche, high-quality products at high prices. In recent years, however, it&#8217;s captured business by keeping costs more competitive. The company&#8217;s lower price strategy applies not just to its iPhone and iPad products, but also to the MacBook Air&#8211;all have been able to meet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">In the past, Apple had always been seen as a company selling niche, high-quality products at high prices. In recent years, however, it&#8217;s captured business by keeping costs more competitive.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s lower price strategy applies not just to its <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/iphone/">iPhone</a> and <a href="http://www.cnet.com/apple-ipad/">iPad</a> products, but also to the MacBook Air&#8211;all have been able to meet or beat the prices offered by some of its rivals, according to an analysis in last Friday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/24/technology/apples-lower-prices-are-all-part-of-the-plan.html">New York Times</a>. But Apple also keeps its own internal costs down by locking in prices on huge amounts of hardware components through multi-year deals with manufacturers.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2044" title="apple macbook air" src="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/apple-macbook-air.png" alt="" width="620" height="226" />Looking at the <a href="http://www.cnet.com/iphone-4s/">iPhone 4S</a>, Apple sells the entry level 16 gigabyte model for $199. That price comes in lower than some of the popular Android handsets, such as Motorola&#8217;s Droid Bionic ($299 through Verizon Wireless), though as <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/motorola-droid-bionic-verizon/4505-6452_7-34468463.html">CNET&#8217;s review points out</a>, the cost drops to $199 if you shell out $50 for a data plan.</p>
<p>The Times also noted that the Samsung Galaxy S II sells through T-Mobile for $230, though it&#8217;s available through <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-6452_7-10009623.html">AT&amp;T for $199</a>, while the <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/htc-amaze-4g-black/4505-6452_7-35022497.html">HTC Amaze 4G</a> costs $260 through T-Mobile, but it can also be had from such retailers at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Galaxy-4G-Android-T-Mobile/dp/B004N62J60">Amazon</a> for $199.</p>
<p>However, smartphone consumers who don&#8217;t want to choose an expensive data plan, switch carriers, or check Amazon for better deals could easily see the iPhone as the best option based in part on price.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><img class="size-medium wp-image-2045 alignright" title="apple ipad" src="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ipad-300x166.png" alt="" width="270" height="149" />Then there&#8217;s the iPad.</h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The first crop of Android tablets that hit the market failed to come close to the iPad&#8217;s entry-level price of $499, with the Times specifically pointing to the <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/motorola-xoom/">Motorola Xoom</a>, which was priced at $800 off contract. The failure of Android tablet makers to compete on price or quality gave Apple the opportunity to corner the market.</p>
<p>Now, of course, rival tablet makers have finally caught on and are quickly introducing models that match or beat the iPad on price. Amazon may present the biggest challenge when it launches its $199 Kindle Fire next month. But even though the <a title="Android coming on strong in tablets, Q3 data shows -- Friday, Oct 21, 2011" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20123693-17/android-coming-on-strong-in-tablets-q3-data-shows/">iPad&#8217;s share of the tablet market has dipped</a> over the past several months, Apple is <a title="Apple to sell 149 million iPads in '15, researcher says -- Thursday, Sep 22, 2011" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20110077-17/apple-to-sell-149-million-ipads-in-15-researcher-says/">expected to hang on to its leading share</a> at least over the next several years.</p>
<p>Even Apple&#8217;s traditionally high-priced laptops have seen their prices chopped. In July, the company tweaked its MacBook Air and <a title="Hands-on with new 11-inch and 13-inch MacBook Air -- Wednesday, Jul 20, 2011" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20081101-1/hands-on-with-new-11-inch-and-13-inch-macbook-air/">cut the entry-level prices</a> to $999 for the 11-inch model and $1,299 for the 13-inch edition.</p>
<p>Finally, Apple&#8217;s own costs are kept in check, noted the Times, as the company uses its hefty war chest to stock up on large quantities of flash memory and other components. This puts its rivals in a difficult position as they then have to pay higher prices for the small amount of memory left in the marketplace.</p>
<p>Yankee Group analyst Carl Howe told CNET that the pricing strategy shows current CEO Tim Cook&#8217;s hand at work, as he had been running the supply chain for 13 years.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is not a new thing,&#8221; Howe said. &#8220;They started this process in 2005 when they prepaid $1.25 billion for flash memory. It was an unheard of deal at the time that they would pay in advance for access to a large amount of flash.&#8221;</p>
<p>Howe added that it&#8217;s the type of strategy that a company like Apple, which has a ten-year horizon, can pull off. But companies operating quarter to quarter &#8220;don&#8217;t have a chance.&#8221;<br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #c0c0c0;">[This Article is Copyright of Cnet.com and has been summarized for easier interpretation.]</span></p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"></h5>
<h4 style="padding-left: 30px; text-align: center;">Do you think this strategy can withstand without loosing the quality of products and fan-base that they are most famous for?</h4>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.telemagen.com/news/apple-strategy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Flip</title>
		<link>http://www.telemagen.com/news/oh-flip</link>
		<comments>http://www.telemagen.com/news/oh-flip#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flip Camcorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telemagen.com/?p=1867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flips have Flopped

"The brand is being dispatched as the company refocuses, done in by the proliferation of high-definition sensors into smartphones and PMPs and the like." -Cisco CEO John Chambers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/flip-ultra-mino-video-cameras.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1868" title="flip-ultra-mino-video-cameras" src="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/flip-ultra-mino-video-cameras.jpg" alt="" width="233" height="205" /></a></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Cisco Company  killing</h2>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Flip line of camcorders</h2>
<h6 style="text-align: center;">550 employees get flipped<br />
to the curb in the restructuring effort</h6>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Once a spunky upstart with oddly shaped camcorders, you got snapped up by <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/cisco">Cisco</a> in Spring of 2009 for a hefty $590 million in stock.  Cisco CEO John Chambers says the brand is being  dispatched as the company refocuses, done in by the proliferation of  high-definition sensors into smartphones and PMPs and the like. We <em>had</em> been waiting for the company&#8217;s next products (if you&#8217;ll recall, a WiFi-enabled Mino HD hit the FCC just a few months back), but at this point, it looks like  those hopes and dreams will remain unfulfilled. Looks like the &#8220;exit of some consumer operations&#8221;  will lead to 550 employees being left out of work. If you&#8217;ll recall,  the outfit reported in February that sales of consumer products sank 15  percent, while profits slipped 18 percent as margins slid for a fourth  consecutive quarter. Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/08/cisco-umi-hands-on/">Umi</a> will be integrated into the company&#8217;s TelePresence product line and  operate through an enterprise and service provider go-to-market model.  In other words, Skype just ate Umi&#8217;s lunch.</p>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Show Press Release</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'><em>Cisco Restructures Consumer Business  SAN JOSE, CA&#8211;(Marketwire &#8211; April 12, 2011) &#8211; As part of the company&#8217;s comprehensive plan to align its operations, Cisco (NASDAQ: CSCO) today announced that it will exit aspects of its consumer businesses and realign the remaining consumer business to support four of its five key company priorities &#8212; core routing, switching and services; collaboration; architectures; and video. As part of its plan, Cisco will:  * Close down its Flip business and support current FlipShare customers and partners with a transition plan. * Refocus Cisco&#8217;s Home Networking business for greater profitability and connection to the company&#8217;s core networking infrastructure as the network expands into a video platform in the home. These industry-leading products will continue to be available through retail channels. * Integrate Cisco umi into the company&#8217;s Business TelePresence product line and operate through an enterprise and service provider go-to-market model, consistent with existing business TelePresence efforts. * Assess core video technology integration of Cisco&#8217;s Eos media solutions business or other market opportunities for this business.  &#8220;We are making key, targeted moves as we align operations in support of our network-centric platform strategy,&#8221; said John Chambers, Cisco chairman and CEO. &#8220;As we move forward, our consumer efforts will focus on how we help our enterprise and service provider customers optimize and expand their offerings for consumers, and help ensure the network&#8217;s ability to deliver on those offerings.&#8221;  In connection with the changes to the consumer business, it is anticipated that Cisco will recognize restructuring charges to its GAAP financial results, with an aggregate pre-tax impact not expected to exceed $300 million during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2011. The charges will be disclosed in upcoming earnings conference calls and quarterly Form 10-Q filings. Additionally, the company expects this will result in a reduction of approximately 550 employees in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.</em></div>
				</div>
<address><span style="color: #999999;">This article source is copyright Engadget.com</span></address>
<address><span style="color: #999999;"><br />
</span></address>
<h3>Do you think SmartPhones willl replace the camcorder?</h3>
<p>Leave a comment below:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.telemagen.com/news/oh-flip/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone VS. Android</title>
		<link>http://www.telemagen.com/news/iphone-vs-android</link>
		<comments>http://www.telemagen.com/news/iphone-vs-android#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gingerbread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telemagen.com/?p=1829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which one will give you the most bang for your hard earned buck?
You can evaluate iPhone and Android devices from countless angles, so rather than pretend that we've got the One True Comparison, it only seems appropriate to highlight that we're not necessarily your average user.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>A Starting Point</h3>
<p>You can evaluate iPhone and Android devices from countless angles, so rather than pretend that we&#8217;ve got the One True Comparison, it only  seems appropriate to highlight that we&#8217;re not necessarily your average  user.</p>
<p>For our purposes, we&#8217;re measuring each phone OS against 20 features we  care about most, declaring a winner (or a tie) for each category, and  adding it all up. The extent to which our measurements match up with  what you most care about may vary, but we suspect that many of you share  similar values when it comes to your smartphone.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/500x_iPhone-versus-Android.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1830" title="500x_iPhone-versus-Android" src="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/500x_iPhone-versus-Android.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="928" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>View More Detailed Results</h2>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Ease of Use; Winner: iPhone</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>Android has come a long way in a short time, but from an ease-of-use perspective, the iPhone wins out. You can pick up any iPhone and quickly, easily understand what&#8217;s going on. It&#8217;s got one main button on the front of the device, and everything you do consists of tapping app icons from the home screen. Android devices have several buttons on the front of the device that perform a variety of functions, and once you unlock the screen (and depending on which Android device you have), you&#8217;re confronted with many different possible home screens and ways of doing things from those home screens.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Openness; Winner: Android</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>We really like that the Android operating system is open source, but what&#8217;s more important to most end users is openness in terms of what you can run on these devices. The operating systems themselves are clearly important, but one thing&#8217;s abundantly clear: the applications make the phone. And while Google has yet to get in hot water for rejecting apps based on anti-competitive fear or censorship, Apple has. A lot.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Battery Life; Winner: iPhone </span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>Apple has taken battery life extremely seriously in their careful development of the iPhone, and it&#8217;s shown. While Android devices get a kitchen-sink&#8217;s worth of features that you may consider to be a fair tradeoff for battery life, there&#8217;s little question that the iPhone&#8217;s battery life outlasts that of most Android devices. Battery performance definitely varies from Android handset to Android handset (the recently released EVO is taking big hits for its poor battery performance), but the iPhone&#8217;s battery performance—particularly the new iPhone&#8217;s performance—generally outlasts Android&#8217;s.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Multitasking; Tie </span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>It&#8217;s a big deal that the iPhone is finally getting some multitasking support in iOS4, and while it&#8217;s still not as true of multitasking as Android users enjoy, the tradeoff in terms off battery life improvements is important enough that, overall, we&#8217;d consider multitasking to be a wash.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Software Keyboard; Winner: iPhone </span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>If you talk to anyone who&#8217;s used both the iPhone and Android with some frequency, the general consensus is that the iPhone&#8217;s software keyboard is a good deal better than Android&#8217;s default keyboard. That&#8217;s unfortunate for Android users, but the consolation is that you can install any custom keyboard as your default keyboard on Android, and we&#8217;ve seen some solid keyboard alternatives. Still, the advantage, if only by virtue of being better out of the box, goes to the iPhone.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>System-Wide Search; Tie</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>Apple&#8217;s implementation of Spotlight on the iPhone searches contacts, media, email, applications, notes, and calendar. Android searches most of that (but notably not email), but also integrates with auto-suggest web searches; it also lets other applications plug into it, so the more supported apps you install, the more robust the universal search becomes.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Notification system; Winner: Android</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>This may seem like a silly thing to care too much about, but the iPhone&#8217;s modal notification system is particularly user un-friendly, especially for a device as friendly as the iPhone. You have to act on a notification, and you can only see one notification at a time before the next one dismisses the previous one entirely. Android&#8217;s brilliant pull-down window shade notification tray, on the other hand, is a beautiful thing that could make any iPhone owner jealous.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Voice-to-Text; Winner: Android</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>Nearly every text field on an Android device can be filled with a few words from your mouth, and it works surprisingly well. You can respond to emails by voice, send long text messages by voice while you&#8217;re walking around Target, respond to your editor&#8217;s IMs while you&#8217;re at a graduation ceremony, and so on, as long as you&#8217;re comfortable talking to your phone (it is a phone, so you should be). Apart from voice-to-text in third party apps, iOS doesn&#8217;t support voice-to-text at all.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Syncing; Winner: Android</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>iPhones can be incredible standalone devices, but they&#8217;re surprisingly old-fashioned when it comes to syncing, requiring users to plug into their computers and connect to iTunes to do all sorts of syncing and activating that could be more conveniently done wirelessly. Android phones support pretty great over-the-air syncing with your Google account, so much so that if you were to lose your previous Android phone, simply entering your Google account into a new one can get you up and running with a usable phone in a jiffy.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Non-Google Sync; Winner: iPhone</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>Android&#8217;s great at syncing seamlessly with Google&#8217;s servers, but it&#8217;s not so keen on syncing with other popular sources of data—like, say, Outlook, Address Book, or iTunes. If you&#8217;re a heavy user of any of those applications, the iPhone is the easiest option.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Tethering; Winner: Android </span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>The cost of tethering on Android devices varies depending on the provider, but so far the Android tethering situation is better off than what AT&amp;T is offering on the iPhone. In the States, AT&amp;T will charge you $20/month just for the privilege of tethering your iPhone&#8217;s data connection to a computer—despite the fact that you&#8217;re already paying for a metered data plan. The situation isn&#8217;t necessarily much better across the Android-sphere (Sprint is also planning to charge for tethering on the EVO, for example), but currently most Android carriers are sticking with &#8220;unlimited&#8221; plans, versus AT&amp;T/iPhone&#8217;s 2GB limit. It&#8217;s still a close race on this point, but Android edges ahead with the ability to turn your handset into a Wi-Fi hotspot that can deliver wireless to you and seven of your closest friends.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Release and Update Consistency; Winner: iPhone </span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>These days, your mobile OS is just as important (if not more) than mobile hardware, and Apple has set the consumer expectation to expect that their device will receive new feature updates even if it isn&#8217;t the latest phone. To that end, it&#8217;s extremely easy to keep track of what&#8217;s going on in the iPhone ecosystem. Apple releases one new phone a year, and one major update each year. When an update rolls out, every phone receives the update at the same time (unless it&#8217;s particularly old; the original iPhone won&#8217;t upgrade to iOS4, for example). In contrast, Android runs on a lot of different devices, and when Google pushes out a new update, there&#8217;s no telling when or if it&#8217;s going to make its way to your phone. In the future Google is planning to change to yearly Android updates similar to iPhone OS updates, which will likely help this situation, but in the meantime, it&#8217;s a source of frustration for Android users.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Apps; Tie</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>A lot of people may disagree on this assessment, given that Apple&#8217;s App Store has around four times the number of applications the Android Market does, but there&#8217;s also a lot of crap in the App Store, and at this point, most popular, mission-critical applications have been developed for both the iPhone and Android. What&#8217;s more, some potentially very popular applications end up locked out of the App Store for, if we&#8217;re being generous, arbitrary reasons. At the end of the day, it may be a big deal that your must-have application X is missing from the Android Market/App Store, and those may end up to be dealbreakers for you, but overall we&#8217;d call them pretty even.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Web browsing; Tie</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>The iPhone&#8217;s Mobile Safari browser, while not without its faults, is a very nice, very usable mobile browser. Android&#8217;s browser, while not as smooth an operator as Safari, supports (or can support) Flash. The extent to which that matters to you may vary, but it&#8217;s big enough that we&#8217;re considering it a tie.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Gaming; Winner: iPhone</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>We&#8217;re frugal productivity nerds at Lifehacker, so we don&#8217;t really care all that much about gaming. And while the number of solid gaming options available in the Android Market continue to grow, it&#8217;s still not on par with what&#8217;s available for the iPhone.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Music Player; Winner: iPhone</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>Android may do a lot of things well, but one arena where its users regularly voice complaint is with its default media player. Where the iPhone comes with a very solid iPod app, most Android users quickly go looking for alternative players. Google is hyping over-the-internet streaming of all your music from your desktop computer eventually, but until we see something great there, the iPhone still wins out.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Free Turn-by-Turn Navigation; Winner: Android</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>After the Google Voice debacle from last year, it&#8217;s looking less and less likely that Google will ever develop another new app for the iPhone. Unfortunately, that means that extremely cool applications like Google Maps Navigation, Google&#8217;s free turn-by-turn GPS application, will never make it to the iPhone, and so far there isn&#8217;t anything as good for the iPhone that&#8217;s also free. The iPhone does have its share of solid for-a-price GPS utilities in the App Store (and some decent inexpensive-to-free options), but Maps Navigation is built into Android and outshines the iPhone&#8217;s free alternatives.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Integration with Google Apps; Winner: Android</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>If you rely on Google tools like Gmail, Google Contacts, Google Calendar, and the like, Android just does it better. The iPhone&#8217;s still no slouch, and can sync over-the-air with Contacts, Calendar, and even does Gmail push for instant new message notifications, but if you&#8217;re a serious Google or even just Gmail user, the iPhone doesn&#8217;t stack up to Android.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Google Voice; Winner: Android</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>It may seem absurd to make this a separate point of comparison from Google Apps, but Voice is a very phone-centric app with potentially huge influence over how you use your phone. Apple had the option to approve a Google Voice app for the iPhone and completely blew it. And since we really love Google Voice, it only makes Android look that much more attractive.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Customizable; Winner: Android </span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>You may be able to add a wallpaper to your iPhone desktop when iOS4 rolls out, but beyond that, there&#8217;s not much you can do to tweak your iPhone to exactly how you like it—without jailbreaking, that is. In comparison, Android devices are Mr. Potato Heads of customizability.</div>
				</div>
<div class='et-learn-more'>
					<h3 class='heading-more'><span>Overall Score: Android: 13; iPhone: 11</span></h3>
					<div class='learn-more-content'>Clearly our scorecard is extremely subjective, so take this evaluation with a grain of salt, and consider how important the features we listed (and maybe those we didn&#8217;t list) are to you and come up with your own assessment. If your priorities are similar to ours, you&#8217;re likely looking at an Android for your next purchase. Frankly, it feels a little like a draw overall. (Our ideal would be Android running on the iPhone 4, which is actually possible, eventually.)</div>
				</div>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">[This Article is Copyright of lifehacker.com and has been summarized for easier interpretation.]</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><br />
</span></p>
<h2>Which type of Phone do you choose?</h2>
<p>-Leave a Comment Below-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.telemagen.com/news/iphone-vs-android/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email Do&#8217;s &amp; Dont&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.telemagen.com/news/email-tips</link>
		<comments>http://www.telemagen.com/news/email-tips#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.telemagen.com/?p=1799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New to E-Mailing?
Here are some things to keep in mind...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>We know e-mailing can be confusing&#8230; Here are some things we&#8217;ve learned that might benefit you.</h3>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/holding-email.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1811" title="holding email" src="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/holding-email-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="320" /></a></p>
<h2>DO’s</h2>
<ul>
<li>Always fill in the <strong>Subject:</strong> field with a very brief description of the message as this helps in categorizing the email and later to search for it.</li>
<li>Be brief and on-topic. Long, rambling messages will be ignored and deleted. They are also usually misunderstood.</li>
<li>Keep emails as structurally simple as possible. Not all email software can interpret fancy fonts and stationery.</li>
<li>Use the <strong>CC:</strong> (copy) field to send FYI only messages to certain recipients. One in a CC field should not be expected to comment or reply to the message.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/enquiry.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1812" title="postman" src="http://www.telemagen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/enquiry-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="320" /></a></h2>
<h2>DON’T’s</h2>
<ul>
<li>Email is not the best way to communicate and avoid email wars at all costs.</li>
<li>Do not list a recipient in the <strong>TO:</strong> field unless he/she is expected to act on your message.</li>
<li>Minimize the amount of quoted text and use embedded links to URLs instead. Just copy and paste the links into your email.</li>
<li>Avoid using the “confirm receipt” feature as this is annoying to most and can be avoided by the Outlook user anyway.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Avoid emails for large file attachments. Use shared resources instead.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1>Things to keep in Mind…</h1>
<ul>
<li>The use of CAPITALS is basically the email version of shouting!</li>
<li>Watch your tone in the email. Avoid humor, sarcasm, and irony unless you are absolutely certain the recipient will understand your meaning.</li>
<li>Using the “high importance” or “low importance” flag on EVERY email you send is unnecessary and annoying.</li>
</ul>
<p>﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.telemagen.com/news/email-tips/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

